Home > politics > Why don’t the Swiss shoot schoolkids?

Why don’t the Swiss shoot schoolkids?

Loathe him or loathe him, Piers Morgan did a good impersonation of a human being on Friday when his guests suggested that more guns may be the answer to the school shooting in Connecticut. The former gossip columnist nearly exploded with incomprehension.



In the UK, Morgan rose to prominence at Rupert Murdoch’s flagship tabloid newspaper, The Sun, and is by no means a liberal.

To many of us in Europe, American attitudes to gun ownership are hard to understand. To non-American ears, some of the arguments used by the pro-gun lobby are absurd.

One example I’ve heard repeated recently is that some other countries manage to have high rates of gun ownership without America’s problems. Therefore, the problem is not about how many guns there are, but how you choose to regulate them.

I’m not sure why the gun lobby likes this argument, given that they’re completely opposed to gun control, but there it is.

The argument is also completely wrong, of course.

So, which countries are they talking about? The slightly surprising answer is Israel and Switzerland. Really? The Swiss have a lot of guns? I had no idea. The Israelis… I’m hardly surprised, but I also don’t think Americans would want to live in an Israeli-style society.

But let’s take a closer look at why these countries appear on this list.

The threat facing the average Israeli citizen is orders of magnitude higher than that of the average American, yet the only people allowed to own guns in Israel are those who have reached a certain rank in the military or police. Even then, they’re only allowed handguns and have limited access to ammunition. So, almost all the guns are owned by current or former soldiers or police officers.

The Swiss are a very different bunch to the Israelis, but their gun ownership anomaly is very similar. While Switzerland refuses to take sides in any international conflict (for fear of upsetting the tyrants, dictators and millionaires who hide their swag in its bank vaults) and doesn’t have a standing army, it does require all young men to make themselves available for service in the country’s militia. Those found suitable (ie, fit, healthy and sane) are assigned weapons that they must keep at home. So, almost all the guns are owned by part-time soldiers.

Neither country has anything remotely similar to America’s gun laws, so let’s put this particular myth to bed.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


words from oblivion

Singapore IPOs

words from oblivion

Scene Asia

words from oblivion

S-REIT Investment Blog

words from oblivion

SRS Retirement Fund

words from oblivion

Patrick Chovanec

An American Perspective from China

Trading Fund

words from oblivion

Investing for your future

words from oblivion

words from oblivion

Mao Money, Mao Problems

words from oblivion

Korea Real Time

Analysis and insight into what's making news on the Korean peninsula

words from oblivion

India Real Time

Unique analysis and insights from The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires on the daily news in the world's largest democracy


words from oblivion

Hong Kong

words from oblivion

FT Trading Room

words from oblivion

China Real Time Report

A vital resource for anyone trying to keep up with a country changing minute by minute.

Economics Malaysia

words from oblivion

Chinese Law Prof Blog

words from oblivion

%d bloggers like this: