Home > economics > Economics is disappearing up its own differential equation

Economics is disappearing up its own differential equation

Once upon a time, economists spoke English and wrote books that provided real-world advice for business owners. Nowadays, they speak gobbledigook to one another while everyone else ignores them.

That, at least, is one person’s lament. Writing in the Harvard Business Review, Ronald Coase argues that it is time for economists to come back in from the cold.

It is time to reengage the severely impoverished field of economics with the economy. Market economies springing up in China, India, Africa, and elsewhere herald a new era of entrepreneurship, and with it unprecedented opportunities for economists to study how the market economy gains its resilience in societies with cultural, institutional, and organizational diversities. But knowledge will come only if economics can be reoriented to the study of man as he is and the economic system as it actually exists.

Coase claims that Adam Smith was widely read by “businessmen” of the day, by which he presumably means that today’s businessmen cannot understand today’s economists.

I’m not sure I buy any of that. It seems to me that economics is more accessible than ever before. From books like Freakonomics through to blogs and podcasts and award-winning documentaries… there’s no shortage of material offering real-world insights to entrepreneurs and businessmen.

However, this is clearly not the mainstream of economics. Most of the jobs available to professional economists require a theoretical approach — they sit in an office and look at numbers.

Today, production is marginalized in economics, and the paradigmatic question is a rather static one of resource allocation. The tools used by economists to analyze business firms are too abstract and speculative to offer any guidance to entrepreneurs and managers in their constant struggle to bring novel products to consumers at low cost.

Anyway, it’s worth a read…

Advertisements
Categories: economics Tags:
  1. November 21 2012 at 10.36 am

    I agree with Coase on this. As the Treasurer of Queen Mary, University of London’s Economics Society, I often find it hard to recruit people to join the society who are not econ students. They simply do not know what the subject is about. Yes, a lot of non econ students have read Freakonomics and the like, but after doing so accuse us of studying something which they perceive to be “common sense”. But perhaps that what mainstream economics needs now, a descriptions of phenomena that can be understood by the common man.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

TheFinance.sg

words from oblivion

Singapore IPOs

words from oblivion

Scene Asia

words from oblivion

S-REIT Investment Blog

words from oblivion

SRS Retirement Fund

words from oblivion

Patrick Chovanec

An American Perspective from China

Trading Fund

words from oblivion

Investing for your future

words from oblivion

words from oblivion

Mao Money, Mao Problems

words from oblivion

Korea Real Time

Analysis and insight into what's making news on the Korean peninsula

words from oblivion

India Real Time

Unique analysis and insights from The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires on the daily news in the world's largest democracy

IN PRAISE OF CHINA

words from oblivion

Hong Kong

words from oblivion

FT Trading Room

words from oblivion

China Real Time Report

words from oblivion

Economics Malaysia

words from oblivion

Chinese Law Prof Blog

words from oblivion

%d bloggers like this: